Synopsis
Through the story of the two brothers and the tramp, The Caretaker
touches on the subjects of mental illness and the plight of the
indigent. Pinter uses elements of both comedy and tragedy to
create a play that elicits complex reactions in the audience. The
complexity of the play, Pinter's masterful use of dialogue, and
the depth and perception shown in Pinter's themes all contribute
to The Caretaker's consideration as a modern masterpiece.
Feedback:
"A night of pure
professionalism. Accomplished performances in a production with no
superfluous gimmicks."
Varsity
"Deft direction, magnificent
cast. Every aspect of this fine production deserves praise."
Local Secrets
Director's notes
I first saw THE CARETAKER as an A
Level student and was captivated by it. Such a raw and real
piece of theatre that threw up more questions than gave up answers
was thrilling to me then, and is now.
It is the enigmatic quality in
Pinter's writing which holds the key to his lasting appeal. We
like to unravel clues, to be made to think.
But I've often wondered whether,
while we're busy doing all this thinking, Pinter is laughing
himself silly. How can we ever figure out all the answers when he
doesn't know them himself?
Because Pinter has never
pretended to know exactly why his people say or do things - only
how they say and do them. He gives us characters, predicament, time
and place and records their words and actions.
So, I figured, we need only stick
to his famously minute stage directions and our work would be
largely done. The text told us when (pause or else don't pause
etc.) and to some extent how ('quietly' or 'with feeling' etc.) to
deliver the text. It was our job to figure out why.
Of course this is easier than it
sounds, particularly for instinctive actors rightly accustomed to
this process in reverse - to exercising their own creative choices
as to a the pace and manner of delivery.
Often it was obvious why certain
lines should march to a particular drum, sometimes it took a
little longer to find the motive to fit the rhythm. And there were
moments we were stumped - we just did it until something in the
syncopation spoke to us - which it invariably did. This I think
was the greatest revelation - that the story could be found in the
sounds - and absence - of speech as much as in its content.
There's a danger of being overly
reverential towards Pinter's dialogue at the expense of
spontaneity, even common sense. As an actor even Pinter was known
to challenge his own stage directions! But they are there not to
obscure, only to clarify - which they do, if you will only let
them.
I remain convinced Pinter does
more than write - he composes. So it is ultimately a question of
performing his score as faithfully as possible.
I thank my truly brilliant cast
for trusting in me.
Sally Woodcock -
Director
Download
the A5 promotional poster (PDF file, 151KB)
|